-
Website
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/ -
Original page
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/youtube-is-losing-hundreds-of-millions-a-month/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
In Spain our Youtube it´s http://www.dalealplay.com, but since December they need money so they have put too much ads, and not segmented (it´s a shame).
I think the consumer it´s ready for links to Amazon or ebay, maybe it´s dificult to manage this segmented advertising. I sugest a tool like Google Adwords, but for Youtube, with approval from Youtube team.
Marcos Fargas
http://redescolaborativas.blogspot.com/
The way they've got the handy "buy it from either iTunes or Amazon" feature (plus higher quality files) is gradually sucking me over to them more often if Google turns up both a YouTube and an imeem choice.
i totally agree.
there is such a great opportunity for everyone. we would all win. another song of my songs, 'black black heart' became a favorite of the anime world and there must be a hundred different anime videos cut to that song on youtube. ahh if only there was a buy button! now multiply that by all the youtube videos that use music or picture...
I wouldn't mind a some links like that over in the sidebar, as long as they're no glaringly ugly or overly obtrusive. Put something subtle, but clear, and I think we've found what the ??? before the Profit is. =)
No harm. No foul. If no one wants to buy anything, there's nothing disruptive and if they do... it's easy.
I had to chime in with my $0.02 - always willing to stir the pot, this time, I've supplied a dissenting opinion.
It's not that I disagree with your premise - they ARE missing out on some money, but is that such a bad thing? The same can be said for Feedburner, Reader, Gmail, and so many other free services (or ad supported services) available thru Google.
There's a huge opportunity to make money on many of these by serving up alternate content, by hooking users up with related service providers, by tabulating user data and reselling it (they wouldn't, would they?!), on and on. But eventually it could get, oh, how to say... spammy.
Maybe it just boils down to how "in your face" you make it. As you and others have indicated, there are those of us who would truly appreciate the opportunity to at least consider purchasing related merchandise. However, there are also those "academic purist" types who would feel put upon by such tactics.
One of the things that makes YouTube so cool is that it is simple, just videos in an easy viewer and a way to share. There are ads, of course, but they are unobtrusive. Same with Feedburner - many of us derive value from the many facets of Feedburner without fees. These are just two examples and Google provides many others (Grand Central, Blogger, and Picasa for instance).
Could Google derive some income by cleverly combining purchase opportunities with these services? Certainly. Would it weaken the sense of community that brings many of us back again and again, ultimately weakening Google's brand? Maybe. Are these monetization schemes part of their core capabilities? I don't know.
Anyway, I think Youtube should hire you. ;)
Although we know there is a screening process die to the fact that youtube has no porn on their site.
That's just what I've heard about targeted ads on youtube
To not take advantage of that massive traffic is really LAME!!!
Interesting post, thanks!
Concerts and merchandise. (this is something that Disney and the likes of Hannah Montana do so well)
Skip the Amazon affiliate program and head straight to concert ticket affiliate programs, merchandise, bobble heads for crying out loud! Who doesn't want a bobble head of David Usher? I know I do!
Content 'owners' should use the content to drive the consumer to products with higher margins.
It really ties in to a post I wrote about whether content is the means or the ends when generating revenue.
What do you think content's purpose is while generating revenue?
Yes you make a good point, of course. I basically am in agreement. Especially if it truly is a service to the user (adding value).
The exception for me is that I can envision a slew of video spam professionally designed for high rank and basically published as ads, thus diluting the entertainment value available and requiring us to further sift and parse to find the nugget (Lord knows there is already enough crap there).
-Shannon
Sounds great, and Pandora is a great implementation of this kind of thinking, but there is no UGC there.
To adapt the oft used metaphor from L&O, this kind of monetizing would be fruit from of the poison tree, wouldn't it? If Youtube was aware, even automatedly, that this was copyrighted material, the legally responsible course of action is to demand proof from the poster that they are the copyright holder and/or simply suspend the account since it's unlikely to be the case. Making money off it directly (click here to give us money for something illegal one of our users did) would probably get them sued. IANAL, but it seems more than a little thorny.
-Dave
i like your idea a lot. definitely got me thinking. however, one issue popped up in my mind. if youtube did this affiliate strategy would that lower the value on the other inventory on the site? Not sure on this one. but i could see one of their in video advertisers getting upset if there were an amazon link distracting users from their ad. especially because the affiliate ads would be tempting for many users. the obvious retort to this is that if more users were clicking on affiliate ads, google would make more money. but maybe google doesn't want to make money for amazon. or maybe they are building some other strategy that would conflict with this affiliate idea. nevertheless, your thinking is really provocative.
I wouldn't like YouTube to have those kinds of ads unless they were done the way iTunes lists what other viewers bought/listened to. I like that iTunes doesn't use a robot to pretend it is having a conversation with you -- i.e. Hi, I noticed you like X, how about buying Y.
I would prefer if YouTube and many others, just kept it simple.
--Amrita
I guess anything that increases sales right?
It took Eggo waffles a long long time to come up with syrup, maybe YouTube will catch on eventually.
I don't go to YouTube to buy things - the two examples you presented (though good in their own right)did nothing to excite me about the upcoming Dark Knight film - my attentions span lasted all about 20 seconds.
Going to a library - or when I went to the library - I didn't expect to find ads in the books I read. Same for YouTube, I enjoy their library (free resource) of videos.
So I don't know how they would go about raking in the dough. I wouldn't mind if they had a separate link to a YouTube mall - that sold niche related items (video cameras, equipment, books, movie gift certificates, etc).
Maybe that’s how they can make some money??
by the way i loved your blog..