-
Website
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/ -
Original page
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/whats-in-a-name-2/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ari Herzog
120 comments · 23 points
-
Don Lafferty
59 comments · 3 points
-
Danny Brown
77 comments · 28 points
-
Dale Cruse
65 comments · 2 points
-
gerardmclean
43 comments · 7 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
While the Iron is Hot
1 day ago · 64 comments
-
I Was Wrong About Twitter Lists
2 days ago · 64 comments
-
The Visible Media Maker
1 day ago · 26 comments
-
Simplicity Trumps Most Other Emotions
3 days ago · 53 comments
-
How to Make Goals Happen- Part 1 – GoalBox
5 days ago · 65 comments
-
While the Iron is Hot
For this post, I agree 100%. As a jack of all trades myself I struggle to label myself as one specific thing. If I say I'm a blog designer - people don't know that I'm also a writer and move on (if they're looking for a writer). If I say I'm a writer - people don't know that I'm also a blog designer and move on (if they're looking for a designer). Its hard to define yourself and as you said, I am just going to do. Being productive doesn't mean you read and write productivity articles all day - its about doing.
We're so much more than boxes or titles.
As for me, I've been dubbed a social media consultant by some, but I usually correct them and call myself a social media experimenter. I'm always learning, reading, trying, and executing. The more I learn and experience the better equipped I am at helping other people, but I don't claim to know enough for you to call me a 'consultant.' Save that for the big wigs making the big money. Give me enough to warrant my time (I love what I do, but I also love spending time with friends and family) and that doesn't necessarily have to very much, and I'll take good care of you and help your business. Call it what you want.
Thanks for the insight Chris. We're definitely on the same page here.
R
I don't let somebody else put me in a box. I ignore the titles some try to label me with. I wear so many titles that no single one describes me anyway. And even with the titles I am sometimes assigned, I do my work in such a way (I guess you'd say creatively, using my own ideas to accomplish something) as to make labeling me impossible. I like it that way. It allows me to be creative.
If I had to label myself I would say: I'm a blogger, a writer, a blogger again, a social media participant, a community organizer, and a fundraiser for a non profit organization. Every year I help raise funds to cure blood, bone, and bone marrow cancers so nobody else need die. I organize folks and raise funds for the Light the Night Walk in my area to provide services for those with blood cancer and to help to eventually find a cure.
I have never had training in fundraising. Nor have I had training in blogging. Perhaps this is good, however, as I haven't been pidgeon holed into a certain way of thinking. I can see things in a fresh way, and see new ideas for things -- not the same old ideas recirculating. This way I can come up with ideas that I never would've thought of.
I have often read blogs and thought the blogging world needed fresh ideas after seeing the same ideas circulating around and around. Or looked over fundraising ideas only to find nothing new, when something could be added if people weren't just imitating one another... How sad. So much creativity and talent going to waste, so many people not getting help b/c of it, so much money that won't ever be made...
Having said all that, it's now time for me to begin learning more about blogging and fundraising. But no matter what I learn, I will always refuse to get in the box others have tried to put me in at times. I will learn those things that I need to to have better skills, and at the same time, I will remain in some ways very much creative and out of the box -- not letting the rest of the world define me. I'll let my morals, integrity and other things that should be defining do it!
Chris, nobody should expect you to get in the "journalist" box. If you choose to be a journalist, that's different -- you could fulfill the title of journalist to the extent that you so chose. But you don't have to, as you know! Perhaps you want to editorialize instead. Than so be it! As long as you have your facts straight in your writing (whether it be a blog, book or whatever) and in your speaking (or reporting) you have the right to say anything you want. I commend you for doing it, too.
Just keep doing what you're good at! Defined or undefined that would be -- keep being you!
Krissy :)
my main blog: Sometimes I Think
my twitter: www.twitter.com/iamkrissy
I think your a bit past the average person who is in a different box, ie the joomla hosting guy, whereas being more exposed the boxes become different and more varied. It is about being YOU!
In photography, I am forced to take a multidimensional world and put it into a static two dimensional space. The photograph is a record of the decisions I have to make to accomplish this compression of space. Without this restriction, I could not add my creative take on the things I see - they would just be as they are un-photographed.
Restriction forces me to find the essence of who I am and what I want to say at that moment.
Matt
My twitter Bio says: "Mobile Video Broadcaster / Teacher / Speaker / Listener / Founder of Boston Media Makers"
I define myself by my actions.
In a recent interview, when asked the question, "what do you do?", I responded that the answer depends on WHEN you ask.
At that moment I had just finished teaching, the day before I was producing video, right now I'm letting you know I was here.
See you tomorrow!
Online.
--Steve
Labels are from the old world.
Just do what you're good in
I started out advertising what I do for business. I ended up being known for hanging out with chicks. At some point, my text blog became popular. People who have known me for months have NO IDEA what I do business-wise, because it never comes up because it's not important.
Remaining ambiguous is fine as long as you're bringing value to people's lives and your own. For people that can't make it happen on the fly, titles are necessary for them to receive enough attention to make money.
a brother,
a son,
a traveler,
a forward thinker,
a dreamer,
a marketer.
Titles are loosing value...fast.
So I usually say "I'm a storyteller".
What I've done my whole career, whether I've been a TV producer, a technical writer, a web designer, or a teacher...is tell stories. I also help other people to tell their stories. Telling people I make my living as a storyteller sometimes gets some weird looks - but after a bit they tend to get it.
Now that I think about it...aren't we all just here telling stories?
I would add sales, leadership, support, education, and coffee delivery too.
Funny, the only thing I care about is my name, not my title. I could spend an entire week writing up all the things I have done and then trying to organize them, but what a waste of time.
I found that I can do anything, especially with the plethora of information on the internet.
So only my name, and once day the Singer / Songwriter (www.jimgaudet.com) will have to give me my domain. How he is older than me, so it is really his name, but I want it....
I think it is human nature to put labels on people and things. It makes us feel comfortable and in control that we "know" how something fits into its "little box". What we as people have to do is resist the temptation to allow our tendencies to turn into judgment.
I agree with you, Chris. Just keep doing what you are doing - and if it is right, the rest will take care of itself. Don't stress on the small stuff, my friend ;-) Life is too short.
There is a difference from a paid review where you're allowed to be objective and one that you need to be a drone. I don't see you as a drone and I value your opinion whether getting paid to blog about it or not.
All those whiners can go home to mommy and cry if they need to but they need to lay off.
Trish
I personally don't like filling out those online profiles like on twitter and social networks and even the about me pages on blogs. It's difficult to sum up who a person is on one page nevermind 160 characters.
Søren Kierkegaard said it best: "Once you label me you negate me."
Maybe I should just say I am a communicator and leave it at that. If someone doesn't like that I was a manager and a director, but never a VP or CMO, that's their problem...not mine. Please don't judge people based on their titles. Judge them on their work, competency and passion (yes, passion counts).
Thanks Chris. I appreciate all you do for the community! Happy holidays to you and your family.
I missed on the whole bru-ha-ha surrounding your integrity...and as it is water under a snow-covered bridge where Jimmy Stewart is probably asking Clarence to "Take me back...I want to live..." I'm just going to say that labels are apparently what the business world needs in order to market something. At least, that is what I'm being told.
Just from a writer's perspective, you either write Science Fiction, Fantasy, or Horror. Agents will tell writers "Can you make this story either all Science Fiction, or all Fantasy? And if you're going ot write in History, can you make it an Alternative History instead. We have to let the bookstores know where to shelve it."
I am defined not by labels but by the company I keep, the talent I possess, and the works I produce. To quote Wil Wheaton, "I'm just this guy, you know?" Well that me: I'm just this guy. A guy with a creative streak. (Better than a guy who streaks creatively...)
Thanks, Chris, for all you do. Again, great post. Merry Christmas, man.
It takes wisdom or hard experience before people realize that the only thing anyone saw last week was Chris Brogan. There's always that misconception that titles, labels, and what not, mean anything. They don't.
All my best,
Rich
Me? I’m a fuzzy, “mess cleaner-upper,” “company helper,” “problem fixer,” “idea pitcher” and all around “communicator.”
But the thing is, now my sister hates being a nurse. And to reinvent herself, she needs to go back to the beginning and learn a new trade and skill set. I, on the other hand, with my ambiguous title pile-up, have had the freedom to reinvent myself every day, with every client I work with.
Ultimately, with social networking, you’re selling yourself as a brand. And I know from past exposure that the Chris Brogan brand rocks. Doesn’t really matter to me what you’re doing today or what you choose to do tomorrow.
Hopefully, the rules of the game are changing (and the posts here seems to reflect that). This is a sweet consolation for the rest of us hyphenates out here in the world.
If I list my names, I become useful to myself and to others.
The expanding, evolving, exquisite, chaotic and creative totality of who I am can never be named beyond the most mysterious name of all names, I, the name of everyone and no one.
Considering there is a semi-famous rapper, a popular software product and a major (european) brand with the same name (as well as a million people with the same nick-name) it seems unlikely that a regular person can 'claim' a slice of the pie but you can (and with people like Chris Brogan giving advice you can get there quicker!).
You hit the nail on the head. If you get too caught up in the definition it keeps the party in question and the observer in that place of categorizing. The beauty of the right brain. If what you do and who you are is just a bit intangible people want to know more, you want to know more and be more.
I am a coach. When I started out I would call myself a "personal coach" because the feedback was the title "life coach" is hokey or "new age". Now when people ask what I do I say "I help people get "un-stuck".
Jennifer
What do you do? On Twitter, I am outlaw_coach, but is what I do coaching, or is it blogging, or is it consulting, is it training? Is it all of these, none, or more? I think what I do is help people succeed in spite of themselves, and as Alan Watts once said, (paraphrasing here) ..
"I know exactly what I do, but when you ask me I don't"
The struggle with labels is ongoing. Labels both define, confine, and refine. Geez, I think I need to blog on that.
I am a CEO. But I am also a marketer, entrepreneur, writer, casual blogger, integrator, web guy, amateur politico, etc. I'm sure each of us can add 100 items to our respective lists. But at the end of the day I'm a CEO. What I do is clear to the world. I'm not saying that's the right way to go because I much prefer your freestyle attitude and your ability to connect with people. I'm just saying that in the real world I won't be able to become who I want to be if I have too many labels.
I'll trust a political scientist first. Then maybe a journalist. Then maybe a politician. But would you trust someone that claims to be all three? There are a lot of ethical lines that need observation here.
Just Doing It
theres your title and yes the Nike reference is there just to f with the haters a bit more
I love this post...thank you Chris! So wise and real, as usual. xo Ellen
I'll add this thought: One person's blogger is another person's journalist is a third person's content creator. And so forth.
I agree with the aforementioned thoughts on labels and classifications, but something I always keep in mind is my audience. Most of the people commenting on this post understand the variety of bloggers out there; but the stereotypical Luddite does not. In this sense, I don't describe myself as a blogger but as an online journalist.
Though, in the end, it's but a name and my name is Ari Herzog.
Chris, you are amazing and your messages are a gift.
And your readers are amazing and their comments fabulous.
genius begets genius!!! Thank you, everyone!!
What was brilliant that it sparked conversation on who - and what - we are all about. I consider myself a true newbie in the social media space, but I think that it won't be long before that space starts to look more like me (a non-marketing-focused business person) than it does the uber-marketers who first realized the power of the space (Godin, Shirky, Jaffe, Brogan, Li, Owyang, Falls et al).
Thanks for staying the course - and for helping all of us to define ourselves a little bit.
Titles are exactly just that. They are often just a way that a company can find a label for a position. Ultimately it's the very hard to answer "what do you do" question that truly defines who and what we are. One thing that I am very happy about is how social media and LIfestreaming are adding a personal dimension to the equation and providing a window bot about and beyond our work that adds a much greater dimension to better help us answer the "what do you do" question.
As far as I see it you are a journalist and your blog is a one-man journal. One of the meaning given by the Oxford English Dictionary for a journal does fit very nicely: "A daily newspaper or other publication; hence, by extension, Any periodical publication containing news or dealing with matters of current interest in any particular sphere."
The practice of what is called in French "publicité-editoriale", or in English "Sponsored Articles or advertorials" is a fairly common one in the traditional press. I am not wild about the practice, of sponsored blog posts, but it is quite common. My understanding is that unlike newspapers or magazines accept commissions publish "sponsored articles or advertorials", blogs/bloggers insist on retaining the freedom to be as critical as they see fit. You were open and honest about it and made quite clear that you were writing sponsored post, therefore what was all the fuss about?
On the whole, if I was to use a label which would fit your many hats, I would probably choose the term of story-teller, in the most noble sense of the term, for I trust and respect your integrity, and one thing I can be sure of is that your are never "telling stories", this time using the pejorative sense of the term.
I guess I'm further behind the game than most the rest of you as the question "what do you do" still causes much too much stress. I spend much of my day answering it (usually simply in my imagination).
I think that Bill (above) was onto something when he pointed out that the desire for simple answers (titles, elevator pitches, etc.) tend to come when you only have a short time to help someone explain why they should hire you. And when you're self-employed, espcially in the early stages, this increases the 'need' to have a simple answer.
I feel the unresolved tension between the above poles of "just be yourself"/"titles are losing value fast"/etc. and the other side of "limitations can help you to make hard choices to focus on what is most truly import to you".
Yet I'm also trying to relax into the paradox. Hoping that I'll soon learn how to enjoy the game, let the story unfold, and not worry so much about figuring out 'who I really am' (vocationally).
Warmly,
Leif
http://www.SparkGuy.com (my year old lame attempt to express myself)
http://www.twitter.com/leifhansen
So yes, the name is fairly immaterial - it's what you do with it that counts.
What i've found working in a large company is that if you bring value, a positive attitude and your perspective ... you can be useful - even make impact - outside of your little box (designated by your title).
It's not about the title ... it you are a person who wants to do things, make impact, have interest in things other than your specialty, etc ... then you can. Your title is a box for you only if you let it be.
Most of the time, strong personal branding requires a solid idea inside the prospects' mind. Furthermore, a single defined word can solve a lot of problems and save a lot of money over time, especially for professionals who want to grow large. Changing names require much more communication—advertising, design, and so on. However, these efforts are usually not sufficient.
On the branding perspective (the only one i touch on this comment), i don't agree with you. People need shortcuts to fool their lack of time. A good (personal) brand stands for one word in the mind.
Cheers. Great article.
Gabriel Rossi- Brazil
I figured out that I am a communication strategist. That made sense to clients. It gave me an area of "specialty" - I only deal with things that pertain to communication. And of course it gave me the scope to tackle many areas of the company - internal and external.
And that is still what I am. Now I do it online more than offline. That's all.
thanks for the good read,
Clay
With a few exceptions, you can give yourself any title you want if you're an entrepreneur or free agent. We define ourselves.. at least we should be able to - as whatever we want to. The exceptions of course are the professions - you can't call yourself a medical doctor, accountant, dentist, engineer, architect etc unless you have the credentials to prove it. I think even journalist used to come under the "prove the credentials" mantle, which may have been why you got the questions.
Unfortunately, we live in a world where the first thing people do is seek to neatly label and box you up so that they can understand according to their own terms of reference.
Even the question "what do you do?" becomes a "sift. classify and box" process... easy to answer to when you work in a traditional setting, difficult when you're outside it or transitioning from it. I think the New World (primarily entreprenuerial and New Media) is charting a new path. At least I hope so. The corporate world revolves around titles and often to approach them (assuming you want to do business with them) you have to relate to their titles first, unless you know them personally. Also, just try dealing with recruiters - they will insist on squeezing you into a reconizable box.
A VP, President, Director, Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Technology Officer, CEO, CFO etc in a large corp. is generally appointed by a board of directors. People defer to and respect certain titles more than others. The higher up the chain the more weight they carry. They make the decisions. The saying "birds of a feather flock together"is still true. I have seen instances where people will select who they talk or do business with solely based on their title. In the business world, you're more likely to get an audience with a CEO if you are a C-level executive,- not a blogger or an author (unless you're world famous) or something else they've never heard of.
I believe people are more than their titles.Titles shouldn't matter, but they do to some - very much. At the same time, when you say you're a long list of things the tendency is still for people to think "jack of all trades, master/mistress of none."
In today's fluid world tapping into our many skills and abilities and having several careers/jobs will be necessary so hopefully that limited thinking is also on the way out and we can quite happily say what we "are" (Copywriter, Consultant or Advisor) rather than what we "do".
By the way I rarely ask people what they do... I prefer to ask the question "Who are you?" I think it gives people more latitude. Oddly enough, some people start by telling me "what they do - or what they did!
I, too, am unaware of any incident to which this post may be a response, but - like Darren - your line about just doing vs putting boxes around things really resonates with me. I am a project manager and writer by trade - both things typically require much forethought and many "boxes," but this year I'm anxious to disentangle from hyper-organization and do a little more jumping into the fray - learning from actual experience instead of analyzing on the sidelines.
It's an exciting prospect! Glad to have your blog to help inspire my journey.
I define myself as an Internet reviewer. But this word can mean so many things. I can be reviewing websites. I can be reviewing mobile internet. I can even be reviewing servers and networks. Though I have some background in computer networking, I would like to define more towards a website reviewer. But who will really understand what that can mean in another way?
Then, when they "Really? How?" I expand by telling an illustrative story ;) I sometimes don't even need to mention my title at all. Also, you would be amazed how many mistake "Copywriting" for "Copyrighting".
This used to be one thing I hated about the music industry when I was working with bands. A new band would come out (Nirvana, for instance) and people would insist on knowing what kind of music they played. Then every new band after would be defined by Nirvana standards, using Nirvana's name when describing other bands' music. "Like a cross between the B52s and Nirvana."
Ultimately, the bands felt boxed in and resented the labeling, but without it, the band couldn't sell it to the manager & the manager couldn't sell it to the A&R guy who couldn't sell it to the label and the label couldn't sell it to the public.
When the public is not "in the know," they need to know what to call something. Or someone.
I change my label for my audience. I may be a writer one moment, a social media consultant the next, a podcaster, an aspiring documentary filmmaker, a Second Lifer, a mom. A wife. (Whoa, that last one still feels odd to this late bloomer).
I'd rather come up with my own labels, however, than have others thrust them on me and have still others view me or judge me by those inaccurate names rather than the ones I give myself.
I guess it's about maintaining your brand or to exceed your brand's expectation.
But here i believe we're talking about a name tied to a person. A person can have many names. That's where i feel @nicky jameson is right about using description instead.
Cheers!
Obviously blown away by this offer I bit their arm off. My next problem was how on earth could one man service and keep this contract without falling over big time.
I knew a local agency that already had all the resources available so in the short term I could tap into them for back up. I was not prepared to divulge my client name to this agency until we had an agreement in writing. All I wanted to support from them to cover the potential massive influx of business.
During a meeting with this agency they were more concerned with the role and tile I was going to use, account director, or creative director. When I said I would be doing both roles and they would offer support as and when needed. They said I would need to decide either I was either one or the other.
Dismayed by their attention to tiles and not just getting on with the job. I told the “business development director” I was no longer interested in working with them and cut the meeting short.
One year later, this agency went bust. During that year I had decided to hire in the help I needed and we turned over just under half a million pounds in just one year.
Who cares what we are called as long as we get the job done.
Thank you for your post and reminding me of my story.
The ideal name starts the positioning process, sets up a communications premise and links directly to a selling proposition. A good name is different, easy to spell, easy to pronounce, a springboard to good graphics and advertising, brief (no more than four syllables), appropriate (but not merely descriptive), and legally defensible
Furthermore, we (humans) tend to do business to whom we trust and admire. In this case, trust is directely related to specialization. You can only communicate your focus by transmitting consistent branding signals. The name of your brand is one of them.
Surely, there's a lot of importance in a name.
Great post.
blogging income entrepreneur.
Meaning I write & find affiliate/business ways to
make money online while blogging.