-
Website
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/ -
Original page
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/social-ads-a-first-take/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ari Herzog
122 comments · 23 points
-
Don Lafferty
59 comments · 3 points
-
Danny Brown
80 comments · 32 points
-
Dale Cruse
65 comments · 6 points
-
gerardmclean
44 comments · 7 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The Old Value-Cost Conversation
1 day ago · 108 comments
-
F Rockstars- Let’s Make Construction Sexy
2 days ago · 89 comments
-
Never Give Up- No, Give Up
2 days ago · 65 comments
-
Beyond Blogging Now Available
2 days ago · 50 comments
-
Holiday Photo Project
6 days ago · 107 comments
-
The Old Value-Cost Conversation
Heck, I block Doubleclick.net in my hosts file, just to cut down on the number of animated ads I see for products I care nothing for.
I don't want to see the meta-conversation about an ad (most of the time).
I am not sure that I want social ads.
I like the idea of clicking through an ad and starting a conversation with the company; just not sure how well that would work.
I also do not see how it could work if I could comment on an ad and then the company could respond. To me that would seem like a closed way of communicating versus a true social aspect where we could communicate openly or in real time.
Still not sure about the whole subject, but curious to see where it goes.
John Lusher
It's already happened. We don't have to buy Music Albums of crappy songs we don't want just in order to get the one great song we want and have to have.
Back in the old days in any small town if the butcher cheated someone everyone in town knew about it.
Now because of social media we all just moved to small towns and the butchers better look out because if they do us wrong everyone in our social media groups will know about it.
The "creative" of the ad would have to be quite something, which makes it hard for the company to constantly hit a winner each time. I wouldn't want to be the creative director in charge of that portfolio!
And then there's a company taking such a "risk" of both sides as you say Chris. Can't see that. Also, too much resources to monitor that, and not sure the value is there in marketing ROI terms either, really.
We know it's going to happen and it's kinda fun watching people figure out how they are going to do it.
Things where I might have a business relationship are disclosed on my about page.
Is that what we're talking about?
As for advertisers coping with the good and bad comments...I think it's inevitable and a necessity. You can't get this close to the consumer and expect to keep editorial control!
It always depends on what the ads are, if they're being censored, and how much creative freedom they allow.
If they create a Hummer ad saying "it's just awesome" - people will dump on the ad. But if they come out with "the new Honda. 300 mpg" people will have a different response - unrealistic, I own one an love it, etc. It's a throw of the dice.
Controversy creates opportunity. At a minimum, the first few ads will generate plenty of inbound traffic as you, me, and scores of others feature the ads in our blogs.
The social media folks will pick over it and perhaps, *perhaps,* consumers will follow.
Crap content usually gets fairly ignored, but anything worth watching usually attracts conversation
I can't see why this wouldnt work for advertising too, crappy ads get ignored or insulted, and good ads get the steroid effect of conversation. Sounds like a decent filter mechanism already :)
Examples:
1. Amazon.com lets people review products on the site. You don't even have to have bought the product from Amazon to write a review of it.
The user based of Amazon.com then provides feedback on that review (feedback on feedback) by stating if the review was helpful to them.
The people who consistantly write good (good = USERS found it helpful) reviews get perks from amazon.
Granted, products on Amazon.com are not ads in a triditional sense... But I don't think they are that far off. There is a blurb from the publisher / producer of the product that talks it up attached to damn near everything there.
You see what I mean?
2. With things like Stumble Upon, and GreaseMonky people can comment on everything they find on the web. Including ads.
True, not a huge amount of people use this service. However, some people do. There is potential for this to grow.
3. Last thing is services like Reddit and Digg. I can see them adding a section where people post ads and enable their users to "talk" about them via comments.
I don't know if this is happened yet.
4. iTunes reviews. I would say that every listing in iTunes is very similar to an ad for the album / podcast / film / etc.
-N
I shouldn't have used 'your'; I basically meant typical blog posts.
I really just wanted to raise a fairly non-intuitive point, just that there's a clear parallel dynamic between the two: streaming reply comments. Not meant to be a damning comparison.
I just found a bit of irony in: 'how do we feel about commenting on ads?' 'leave comments below' :o)
They're an interesting concept...
For the record, I love to help people out, so if you have any questions about ANYTHING, or need some advice, you can follow me @Garbarrassing on Twitter and ask. I will help you out with whatever I can (including giving my opinion about your ad!!!).
I think that like all new forms of media, it requires stepping back and thinking about how to use it off-script. The current idea of "social ads" is "ad" + "comments". But the successful social ads will come from new ideas, not filling out those blanks. Like all other ad creative.
The analogy is that "social games" are not "game + social graph". The successful social games innovate, rather than simply porting tetris + friends. There are new forms of interaction that have emerged out of the opportunity, and there will be here too.
All respect, but I'd suggest that this is the time to imagine what might be done with social ads, and there's little else left to say except that there's an opportunity. If we can't imagine anything beyond Singh's "ads with social elements to them, like comments" then we should leave them be until we can.
It's true -- allowing a conversation thread on an ad could have unexpected negative consequences in the form of brand-bashing, etc. And clicking an ad generally constitutes endorsement, as you said. But perhaps what's afoot here is a bit bigger, and maybe what we're calling a social "ad" isn't actually an "ad" at all.
Maybe it's simply a call to action to vet an idea, a product, or an opportunity. When positioned as a question that solicits my opinion on a particular subject, a subject that is at least nominally relevant to me based on some level of non-invasive personalization, I think we're actually leaving the realm of "advertisement" and moving closer to the realm of something we don't quite have a name for. Something akin to ad hoc product/service testing, opinion polls, or audience research.
Of course, this would be me effective if we do get the "second half of the conversation." Why don't you see companies, at least in the near future, "taking that bet?"
There are a lot of different creative scenarios. For example, a banner ad could just be about product ratings where you're viewing the rating for a product and if you're a user, you can add your rating right in the banner ad itself. It'll bring a greater sense of authenticity. What's interesting is that these ratings and other user generated content elements from the ad can be tied back to a destination website linking on domain community interactions with off domain ones.
Regarding the brand bashing issue, that happens all over the web in any case. Having said that its fair to say that an ad unit like this will be of more interest to advertisers with strong brands and strong products.
i need this info for my site.