<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>chrisbrogan.com - Latest Comments in How Information Will Move</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/how_information_will_move/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:41:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-107847754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Social media is a construct we use to explain how we’re communicating and expressing ourselves&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">youtube downloader</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with many of these concepts and am just as excited as you are about the prospect of the convergence of information and the seamless sharing of that information across technologies. However I have to wonder if the service providers (iGoogle, Facebook, MySpace, Apple, Adobe etc.) are going to truly allow this to happen?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, I would be thrilled to have seamless recognition of multiple formats. My systems SHOULD just be able to play a QuickTime, Flash Video, or WMV without any consideration on my part as a user. As a content creator I would be ecstatic to not have to worry about what format I'm delivering to my audience. Think of the time, effort and money I would save!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does it make sense for Apple, Adobe and Microsoft to forego the branding and advertising opportunities that exist when they make me download their latest plugin in order to receive content? Something tells me no.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe there is a model that will enable the service providers to accept this sort of seamless delivery stream. It will be interesting to see how it plays out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sue Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[x-posted]&lt;br&gt;NET (machines (computers, back end infra (storage, routers, bandwidth, traffic), connectors)) -&amp;gt; WEB (hyperlinked docs, knowledge within docs, [actionable] knowledge objects, descriptors, connectors) -&amp;gt; SOCIAL GRAPH (people - nodes and  connectors).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is (as i like to describe it) the X-to-X NetWeb - person-to-person, person-to-thing, object-to-thing, etc. - actionable in situ as well as @ the point of contact/interaction (think next gen intelligent mashups) - creates new knowledge and insight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;my 2 cents (premoney, of course)... :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EDO</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well thought out concepts Chris.  I believe that you are helping present ideas of future technologies in the context of what we need it to do, rather than what it can do for us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most times, technologies themselves get us side-tracked on their abilities.  Instead, we need to look at what we really expect of technology.  It's often much more intuitive than is realized.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Mahn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been giving this concept some thought also: &lt;a href="http://www.nickhuhn.com/2007/11/16/googlemesh-facebook-ai-and-privacy/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nickhuhn.com/2007/11/16/googlemesh-facebook-ai-and-privacy/"&gt;http://www.nickhuhn.com/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jason Falls gives it a whirl too:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2007/11/19/what%e2%80%99s-after-facebook-or-is-the-migration-over/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2007/11/19/what%e2%80%99s-after-facebook-or-is-the-migration-over/"&gt;http://www.socialmediaexplo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm completely in alignment with your vision of the future.  I just wonder if anyone will emerge to 'own' it or if it will remain an oligopoly of service providers and knowledge aggregators like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Nielsen, News Corp, et al.  It'll be interesting to say the least, and hopefully with a not very 1984ish conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder too when our public information becomes meshed with what we consider private or 'guarded' what will happen with respect to privacy and marketing guidelines?  I predict the proposal of an Information Privacy Act by a grey-haired senator that doesn't quite get it in the next few years.  That will at least put the privacy and information transparency ethical debate on the table.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickhuhn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty heady stuff to ponder as I nurse a turkey-and-stuffing hangover. ;) But the idea of universal, ubiquitous access to information, networks and social connections certainly appeals to me. I also think about the notion of a single, aggregated "network of networks" which would allow me to access everything in a single interface. No logging on to Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, MyRagan, email, iGoogle, Flickr, &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt;, etc. -- just turn on my phone, PC, laptop or whatever device I might have and I'm jacked in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A colleague of mine dreams of a single social network, but humans are too diverse. We break down into tribes, neighborhoods and other social units based on geography and ethnicity (in the old world) and now by interests. I would settle for a single interface.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Careaga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:14:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right, though, Seth. Things will get smaller. Language will change even more. Structures. Styles. As things like lolcats go down into the pit, I think even more things will erupt in strange constructs. We already have weird words that don't really represent the real world. How many more times will this change? What will be the variants?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Language. Logic. Data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisbrogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Information Will Move</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-information-will-move/#comment-8514129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know if you've heard of this computer: &lt;a href="http://www.zonbu.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.zonbu.com/"&gt;http://www.zonbu.com/&lt;/a&gt; I read about it in Time. It has NO hard-drive because all the applications are stored online. Personally, even in a city like New York, I just don't think Wi-Fi is 'there' yet for this kind of thing, but it definitely seems to be the direction we're going in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, not to espouse nutty futurism, but I've been predicting for some time now (blogged it, seesmiced it) that a new universal 'online' language will begin to emerge and develop based on community needs and uses. The thing is we SAY the world is small now, but if I can't communicate with someone who doesn't speak English then is it really that Small? I think we're going to move towards a new grammar that we'll bridge (and break) the language barrier that exists in social networking. I'm not sure how this will start, but....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth E</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:30:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>