Interesting thought. I don't know if Twitter would really change that much. The idea that you are postulating resembles something of a chat room. Those exist. The only difference is that it would be stored in a similar format as Twitter and always accessible by those in the group...
I really don't see Twitter going very far. But I guess that people always say that about the 'new' technologies. It iwll be interesting to see what this transforms into in say 5 or 10 years... or maybe even as little as 2 years!
Steve Woodruff @swoodruff
· 11 months ago
I believe that you are absolutely correct. The Twitter model/concept is here to stay, but the technology will quickly be a commodity. It's the communication flow that is enabled, and the networks built, where the real value lies.
paul merrill
· 11 months ago
Stephen, I can't wait for the next version of Twitter (or Twitter-competitor).
I love how other companies have expanded the usefulness of Twitter already. (Like Thwirl, that I use constantly.)
If Facebook would open source like that, what potential there could be!
Carlton Reid @carltonreid
· 11 months ago
Twitter is quite crude and simple, a better tool could come along. But the simplicity is Twitter's beauty. There are many third-party clients that add the (probably necessary) bells and whistles.
TweetDeck, for instance. I'm not connected to TweetDeck in any way, it's just a great app. And Tweetie for the iPhone is another.
These apps enrich and enable the Twitter experience, filtering at the same time. Of course, the main worry has got to be Twitter's monetisation plan. Some of the third party apps make money, Twitter doesn't yet. And without a revenue model, and quick, Twitter could one day disappear in a puff of smoke.
If it does, many of us may switch to the next Twitter-like tool, but many would abandon the 'experiment'. I hope Twitter can make money.
Dad Brogan
· 11 months ago
I agree with Stephen. Right now twitter has many useful features for many types of companies, individuals and groups. I have been involved in IT since the mid 1970's and I am still amazed that people think that the product of today is it. It just cannot get any better - and then out comes an IBM PC competing against an Apple PC (Macs were not even out yet ... mice ... what were they talking about). DOS was here to stay.
I cannot wait for wait is the next revolution or would that be evolution of Twitter and the tools, like Tweetdeck to go with it.
brandonacox
· 11 months ago
Twitter will evolve as any other technology, but they have the advantage of being "king of the hill" right now. That is, other potential competitors can't seem to get it together in the sense of funding or simplicity. I think Twitter will be able to hang on for the ride as its popularity grows. Even though it's simple, it also captures several facets of online life - friendship, business, marketing, content sharing, next-to-email-like communication, etc. I think it's here to stay.
Jeff Shattuck
· 11 months ago
I don't think Twitter and AOL is a good comparison. AOL was subset of the Internet, offering people a trade-off: less access, more simplicity.
Twitter, on the other hand, is emblematic of our soundbite culture. We like information in little chunks, which Twitter enables. If Twitter "evolves" I fear it would be akin to cluttering up the Google search page. Or, remember Alta Vista? It was awesome, until they decided to become a portal packed with push content.
For Twitter to succeed, it needs to figure out how to make money from its service without ruining the experience. Tough job, in my opinion .
Jeff
Jeff
Penina
· 11 months ago
I agree, because I remain convinced that human beings will never stop reinventing the web!
Ed
· 11 months ago
I can't find it now, as the old account no longer exists. But I called twttr (original name), "the next http". Of course that was a slight exaggeration for flavor, but the point remained. This was 2 years ago, before much of what twitter is now, existed.
It will largely come through a ubiquitous use of @Username, which I proposed to Evan Williams and VC Fred Wilson. (Fred also backs Disqus, who could best co-code this).
Steven Wilson
· 11 months ago
I feel that with the right funding that twitter is here to stay for quite sometime.It will also be interesting to see all the other sites that will come along using the twitter model in the near future.
Ben
· 11 months ago
Technology is constantly changing. Twitter, like most other things that happen online, probably will not be relevant years down the road. It may have led to something even greater. It is a great predictor of the information that people want, the way we access that information, and the way we would like to communicate.
warzabidul
· 11 months ago
Twitter is a modern version of meetup.com rather than aol, it's free for the moment as people get used to using it. In a while people will get tired of using it and so other services will come to replace it.
Facebook, at least in Europe is a far more interesting tool for what twitter does because everyone you know (or almost) already use the service. As a result twitter is a lot of effort for very little return.
Get out of the capital cities, go to the countryside and you'll see just how useless twitter is.
Tom Martin
· 11 months ago
I don't think Twitter is for everyone, just as any technology. But for two classes of people, I think it will certainly play a role in its current or some future form, in their lives.
The "Chatty Cathy's" -- folks that like to talk to lots of other folks, build relationships, and in general just meet and befriend lots of interesting people. I've yet to find any tool that enables this type of activity better than Twitter. The ability to accidentally find people because you see their handle referenced in a tweet from someone you follow is about as easy as it gets.
The "Info Hounds" -- folks that are constantly in search of knowledge. Twitter is like a human managed RSS stream. It has already spawned Twitter like services such as Yammer. A service we've adopted at my company and are using to create a web-based shared information database using hashtags as markers/keywords for everything we put into the Yammer cloud. Is that what the folks at Yammer had in mind? Maybe. Maybe not. The point is, we saw a technology and a need and married the two to create a truly useful little application for our company.
As for AOL -- it is still alive and well, but now we call it AIM. They just evolved to match the new world order they helped create. As I'm sure (or at least hope) Twitter will do as well.
eva
· 11 months ago
As newbe to twitter I totally agree with you. I followed someone here as we are working in small group project 9where I recieve daily tweets of progress). However I am quickly realising that Twitter is definitely alot more participative than other communication tools. So an obligation to the "group" exists (thats if you have defined one). As a new person to a "community" ~ my community is evolving, but eventually through time it can be tweaked, creating hierarchies & structures so filtering of information can also take place, if I want. The hard part is creating the community that defines your aims and YOU as so much "noise". If you can survive that background I would imagine it is an incredibly powerful communication tool as it places a "demand" for dialogue. It takes a certain type of person to be here. Quite assertive & vocal. I am not like that, but we all follow our own style and hopefully each personality can contribute to & enrich the forum.
Scott Mahler-Datex Media
· 11 months ago
Given the fact that more and more of the people I speak with about business bring up twitter on a daily basis, I have to say I believe social media is here to stay. It isn't a fad, it's a revolution and, as you say, a new way of communicating. The people that believe this is nothing more than a craze should only look back at when emailing first took off and google, which has now become a verb as well as a noun, to understand the impact sites like twitter are having, and will continue to have, on business. And a word to the wise for these businesses, the longer you wait to jump aboard, the more business you'll lose to smaller companies like mine.
Caleb Gardner
· 11 months ago
I love the AOL comparison. What's interesting about it is that while AOL was amazing because of what it could do (at the time), Twitter is amazing because of what it *doesn't* do. It doesn't pretend to be anything more than it is. It is beautiful because of its simplicity.
AOL had a large set of very controlled functions, whereas Twitter has a small set of very open functions that many have built upon. I think you're on to something when you say that Twitter is the future - building simple tools that can be elaborated upon by creative developers. The future is openness and authenticity.
Of course Twitter will fade, as all things do. But right now it is posed to change the way we think about communications.
TStrump
· 11 months ago
True ... this is only the beginning. Who knows what the internet will look like in the next 10 years.
Allen Weiss
· 11 months ago
When I think about these issues, its a matter of looking at the right level of analysis (the technology versus the use of the technology) and the people (such as the demographic) of who is using it. Social media is here to stay because people have always had a need to connect (think notes in a bottle in the ocean, smoke signals, and any social connection you feel when there is a common purpose - such at a sports event or inauguration). When people talk about Twitter, they are talking about the technology, and I think it's just a passing technology that will evolve into some other way for social connection. My prediction is based on just looking at my son (17) and daughter (15), who could care less about Twitter. So when they get older they will still have the need for social connection - as people always have had - but will be looking for something easier to use, adapted to their interests, and well, just different. it's always been this way, and will likely continue. At least that's my personal observation.
Caroline
· 11 months ago
What I love about Twitter is I can be social without being social. Meaning....I can meet people I want to meet, exchange a few words, and be gone. I don't have to worry about hurting anyone's feelings for having to make an exit out of conversation.
Like Chris Brogan, for instance, I'd really like to meet him some day. He seems like an interesting fellow. But I would never know about Chris if it weren't for his internet presence. Guy Kawasaki is cool too. All these cool, hip people that I would never know or get to interact with if it weren't for Twitter.
It took running into some avid twitterers in Denver to finally jump on - here is the little video clip. %L[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fTL7c7wVI8]What's the big deal about Twitter?%L*
Enjoy!
Andy Shaindlin
· 11 months ago
As others have pointed out elsewhere, it is Twitter's functionality that will likely live on, after the app and company have faded. Embedding Twitter-like feeds into other kinds of sites (especially blogs), and making Twitter content portable and ubiquitous is what will lend it longevity. It has been described as "a feature, not an application." I think that's where its future lies.
Dan London
· 11 months ago
It will have a future.... as long as a revenue stream is found.
Cartagena
· 10 months ago
First of all, I think we should separate two terms. Twitter and Microblogging. The term 'Twitter' is very often wrongly used for Microblogging. It's the first thing I've noticed when I red this article and the comments. The AOL comparison matches perfectly. Imagine at the time when, as an AOL user you just could email to other AOL user and vice versa. It was a walled garden and it took time till email became a way of communication everybody could use. Same with Twitter. Twitter users just can communicate with Twitter users. Same for users of other microblogging services, and so on. In the comments here I red alot about Twitter and which way it will evolve. When you look over to Laconica and its most popular service identi.ca, for instance, you see microblogging evolving: No walled gardens anymore! It doesn't matter on which network your signed in because everything goes over the Openmicroblogging-Protocol. Just to let you know because imo this discussion ist too simple-minded ;-)
Elise
· 8 months ago
Now that marketers have embraced Twitter, it seems like everybody is tweeting and nobody is listening. Isn't it possible that Twitter fatigue will set in and people will tune-out or leave for the next big thing?
Turbo Cash Generator Review
· 7 months ago
It's nice to read your blog. Personally I don't think Twitter will become something more advanced. For some reason I like the Facebook model more than Twitter. Now its the peak of Twitter, but maybe not the same after around 2-3 years.
All Comments
I really don't see Twitter going very far. But I guess that people always say that about the 'new' technologies. It iwll be interesting to see what this transforms into in say 5 or 10 years... or maybe even as little as 2 years!
I love how other companies have expanded the usefulness of Twitter already. (Like Thwirl, that I use constantly.)
If Facebook would open source like that, what potential there could be!
TweetDeck, for instance. I'm not connected to TweetDeck in any way, it's just a great app. And Tweetie for the iPhone is another.
These apps enrich and enable the Twitter experience, filtering at the same time. Of course, the main worry has got to be Twitter's monetisation plan. Some of the third party apps make money, Twitter doesn't yet. And without a revenue model, and quick, Twitter could one day disappear in a puff of smoke.
If it does, many of us may switch to the next Twitter-like tool, but many would abandon the 'experiment'. I hope Twitter can make money.
I cannot wait for wait is the next revolution or would that be evolution of Twitter and the tools, like Tweetdeck to go with it.
Twitter, on the other hand, is emblematic of our soundbite culture. We like information in little chunks, which Twitter enables. If Twitter "evolves" I fear it would be akin to cluttering up the Google search page. Or, remember Alta Vista? It was awesome, until they decided to become a portal packed with push content.
For Twitter to succeed, it needs to figure out how to make money from its service without ruining the experience. Tough job, in my opinion .
Jeff
Jeff
But I called twttr (original name), "the next http".
Of course that was a slight exaggeration for flavor,
but the point remained.
This was 2 years ago, before much of what twitter is now, existed.
It will largely come through a ubiquitous use of @Username,
which I proposed to Evan Williams and VC Fred Wilson.
(Fred also backs Disqus, who could best co-code this).
Facebook, at least in Europe is a far more interesting tool for what twitter does because everyone you know (or almost) already use the service. As a result twitter is a lot of effort for very little return.
Get out of the capital cities, go to the countryside and you'll see just how useless twitter is.
The "Chatty Cathy's" -- folks that like to talk to lots of other folks, build relationships, and in general just meet and befriend lots of interesting people. I've yet to find any tool that enables this type of activity better than Twitter. The ability to accidentally find people because you see their handle referenced in a tweet from someone you follow is about as easy as it gets.
The "Info Hounds" -- folks that are constantly in search of knowledge. Twitter is like a human managed RSS stream. It has already spawned Twitter like services such as Yammer. A service we've adopted at my company and are using to create a web-based shared information database using hashtags as markers/keywords for everything we put into the Yammer cloud. Is that what the folks at Yammer had in mind? Maybe. Maybe not. The point is, we saw a technology and a need and married the two to create a truly useful little application for our company.
As for AOL -- it is still alive and well, but now we call it AIM. They just evolved to match the new world order they helped create. As I'm sure (or at least hope) Twitter will do as well.
AOL had a large set of very controlled functions, whereas Twitter has a small set of very open functions that many have built upon. I think you're on to something when you say that Twitter is the future - building simple tools that can be elaborated upon by creative developers. The future is openness and authenticity.
Of course Twitter will fade, as all things do. But right now it is posed to change the way we think about communications.
Like Chris Brogan, for instance, I'd really like to meet him some day. He seems like an interesting fellow. But I would never know about Chris if it weren't for his internet presence. Guy Kawasaki is cool too. All these cool, hip people that I would never know or get to interact with if it weren't for Twitter.
It took running into some avid twitterers in Denver to finally jump on - here is the little video clip. %L[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fTL7c7wVI8]What's the big deal about Twitter?%L*
Enjoy!
The AOL comparison matches perfectly. Imagine at the time when, as an AOL user you just could email to other AOL user and vice versa. It was a walled garden and it took time till email became a way of communication everybody could use.
Same with Twitter. Twitter users just can communicate with Twitter users. Same for users of other microblogging services, and so on.
In the comments here I red alot about Twitter and which way it will evolve. When you look over to Laconica and its most popular service identi.ca, for instance, you see microblogging evolving: No walled gardens anymore! It doesn't matter on which network your signed in because everything goes over the Openmicroblogging-Protocol. Just to let you know because imo this discussion ist too simple-minded ;-)
http://www.musicafter50.com/2009/07/looking-for...