<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>chrisbrogan.com - Latest Comments in Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/do_you_have_to_touch_every_conversation/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:15:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-28935334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you man&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-25753619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really, too many media sometimes confusing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ldii</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-10733469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris, great your post. &lt;br&gt;I believe that some social network has a too large set and this leads to a wrong interpretation of his use by  final utents.&lt;br&gt;Facebook in Italy's a garbage container !&lt;br&gt;Ciao and good work to all your reader. &lt;br&gt;Gennaro de Concilio &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gennaro de Concilio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.  For me, the bottom line is, there are so many different conversations going on out there, no one can be a part of them all and still have time for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LisaNewton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Chris.  You should use the site(s) &lt;i&gt;that work well for you.&lt;/i&gt;  One can't be on every social media site and do well at &lt;i&gt;the particular one or two he deems most important.&lt;/i&gt;  That's because he would be spreading himself too thin, and wouldn't have the time/creativity to focus to on getting what he needed from the social media forum that is most important to him, nor the time/creativity to give to others on the particular social median that was his favorite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd say it comes down to choices.  Which sites are going to help you meet your goals?  If you are spending time on sites that will not enhance anything for you, your blog, or your online presence, why would you stay on that social media site?  Even if you want to help others, unless you feel called to particularly help at &lt;i&gt;that particular social media site&lt;/i&gt;, go elsewhere.  You can help others (while still helping yourself) on another social media site.  Just help them where you feel you should be!  Don't waste time where you shouldn't be, life is too short.  I have seen far too many bloggers do this.  They join any and all social media sites because they have heard a particular site happens to be the "cool" site to join, with no regard for &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; they have joined the particular site.  Ask them and they have no idea why they've joined.  Now they are caught up in social media to the extent that they sometimes seldom blog.  I've seen it happen.  It's a trap to be guarded against.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, your last few posts have been excellent.  As always.  I loved the one about "What Arists Can Teach Everyone About Social Media"  &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/9hu85r" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/9hu85r"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/9hu85r&lt;/a&gt;  Very excellent!  Thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Krissy :)&lt;br&gt;visit my main blog: &lt;a href="http://sometimesithink-krissy.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sometimesithink-krissy.blogspot.com"&gt;Sometimes I Think&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;visit me on Twitter: &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/iamkrissy" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.twitter.com/iamkrissy"&gt;www.twitter.com/iamkrissy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">krissy knox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed Chris, offer input where you can add value.  If you're following conversation for business purposes I think people must bring something to the conversation - a different perspective or new information - rather than just chiming in to be noticed.  Further, if do have a specialization in an area you should be offering it the communities where your knowledge is valued eh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Such is the real world, people get involved where they have an interest and can be a part of something.  Those that are not involved in a particular community and have alterior motives than giving to or serving the true interests of the group are easily identified.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who really has time to be involved in every conversation?  If you do, how they heck do you do any work :).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Always love your posts Chris -Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Cronkhite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 00:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the simplicity with which you get things  across.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently I became a member at friendfeed and now am wondering whether I did  the right thing.It broadcasts my comments  to everywhere -  from linkedin to facebook to twitter . is it needed ? my conversation at one "cafe "  as you put it so well need not be influenced by or related to my comments at a different platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of the recent faux pas from Guy Kawasaki when he placed his blog post url "art of laying off..." on twitter. His presentation was actually for a very different audience and quite bang on. It brought in some needless flak.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I strongly feel that social media is not a platform for selling.For instance, sometimes we get some direct sales pitches for products and services.It doesnt take long to un-follow. People who do that may actually be alienating their audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a great place for possible buyer and seller to see each other and become aware of the sales potential but the moment sales pitches start happening its time to shift.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prakash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm ..definitely ..&lt;br&gt;it infact reminds me of the last time somebody tried to approach me on twitter forcefully.&lt;br&gt;Definitely marketeers donot need to be all over the place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek Khandelwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post and thread, and it inspired me to buy The Dip for my Kindle. Today I plan to quit some things!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len Edgerly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529088</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some (and only some) of the SocNet rock stars can spread their focus.  The make money from being able to do so.  But thats a very special talent.  Most Social media specialists seem to have it to some degree or another but, again, we aren't all SocnetRockstars or Social Media Specialists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I make my living from SAP, so that what I try to docus on with twitter &amp;amp;tc.  It is difficult to focus, and I loose it sometimes and start socialising.  But my SAP work (which i do enjoy) pays the bills, keeps the wife and kifs feed and happy, so I need to focus their rather than go surfing after the latest shiny toy that Scoble reports on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, I do make time for the later, but if I'm using the 'net to further MY brand, i have to focus on what I'm good at / doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">martin english</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:03:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's no such thing as a 'social media expert' and we can't be on every platform, all of the time. Would we suggest to a client that they do that?! No. So why should we? It would be completely unmanageable, there would be a lot of hit and miss and there's no way we could give quality time to each and every one. Focus on what works best for you... thankfully there's so much out there now to choose from of which I am glad because that's enabled me to give up blogging - shock horror! Hurrah for microblogging!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danielle Warby</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh sorry - I meant Zazzle!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S.  Fully agree with Amanda "Focus on actively participating in what yields positive results."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I try to get a feel of "every" conversation in all other social media but I find that TIME isn't on my side.  I don't have the time to update myself or whatever, in every social media.  I feel Tumblr, Plurkme, Xazzle and Twitter to be the easiest to use but somehow I spent more time on Twitter (that cartoon bird worked I guess!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not totally about which social media is better (each one has its flaws and strengths) but I feel if you focus long enough in just one social media, over time you can 'build' a community who's interested enough to follow you - even if you post infrequently.  Even if the build-up is slow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:51:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In response to Timothy's comment: Different folks get excited about different stuff. Personally, I enjoy online interaction, and I enjoy face-to-face interaction too. I don't get starry-eyed, but, it can be quite time-saving being able to have a business conversation or meeting sitting at home in your pajamas. I've often had to drive across town to such meetings, wasting time getting dressed up; time driving there and back, and money spent on gas, only to find the meeting (like so many are) was largely a waste of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eyebee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:43:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Taking a page from a small child's playbook- eating when hungry, playing with what you find engaging, inviting in those who can play nice and add to the experience...it's all there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Focus on actively participating in what yields positive results.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amanda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Completely agree that you cannot join every conversation going on out there. It is important to find the sites that work for you, but also pay attention to the other conversation occurring.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kara</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Brogan in comments:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I’ve doubled my business earnings from Twitter."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That would be an excellent article...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;d&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darryl Parker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:03:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At what point do the social media platforms become just one big playground and everyone finally realizes all this new conversation bollocks is just the slick, virtual version of all the old conversation bollocks?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, you can make contacts and money by hanging out in bars and golf clubs and conferences et al and chatting with like-minded people too. And guess what? These are called conversations also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I don't do this because I don't like it..." Of course not Chris. Why should you like everything just because it's new and comes through your computer. Just like the people who prefer to hang out at the chess club instead of the golf club.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't understand how normally intelligent people are so starry-eyed over shiny graphics and the fact that you can have business conversations in your pyjamas from home.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timothy Coote</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I Agree&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">manshurin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Michael Darwin - Even though I really have nothing further to add to this conversation, I had to give you props for the reference to Q. Brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Weaver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a constant topic I'm discussing with artists. My big thing is not wasting time in places you don't have any positive feedback or revenue from. Why waste time in Myspace or Pownce if noone is there that is worth talking to? or believes you are worth networking with?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Natasha Wescoat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:22:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too many people, too many conversations. You can't be everywhere, unless you are Q.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Durwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really appreciate, and relate to, this post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just last week, I started following you and some others on Twitter considered to be "on top of it." For the life of me, I just can't keep up with Twitter, and I can't get the hang of it. Yes, I understand it, but it sometimes overwhelms me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, I know the only way I'll figure something out is to just jump in and give it a try. So we'll see what happens. But there's no way to keep up with everything going on in the social universe, and doing so means you'll do it all at a mediocre level, at best.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Duncan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fishing is a great analogy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brings back memories of taking customers to fish north of Ontario, Canada.  The real fans brought their fly rods while the rest toted regular type ones.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, we all had a good time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I have elected to learn and join communities via LinkedIn, Facebook Twitter, but am smart enough to read others' blogs to at least keep me informed of the tools they are using.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carlos Hernandez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:12:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have To Touch Every Conversation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-you-have-to-touch-every-conversation/#comment-8529073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After understanding what a polymath is (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath)it" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath)it"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt; brings me back to a fishing quote by G. Love "dreams are like fish you gots to keep reelin'". A couple of threads through all these comments: (1) point, (2) passion, (3) personality and, (4) perseverance (source: Short and Taton). I would argue you if you can't commit, or keep reelin' it's not a worthwhile or sustainable social media tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FishonYukon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:36:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>