-
Website
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/ -
Original page
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/do-what-works-for-you/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ari Herzog
120 comments · 23 points
-
Don Lafferty
59 comments · 3 points
-
Danny Brown
77 comments · 28 points
-
Dale Cruse
65 comments · 2 points
-
gerardmclean
43 comments · 7 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
While the Iron is Hot
1 day ago · 60 comments
-
I Was Wrong About Twitter Lists
2 days ago · 64 comments
-
The Visible Media Maker
1 day ago · 23 comments
-
Simplicity Trumps Most Other Emotions
3 days ago · 53 comments
-
How to Make Goals Happen- Part 1 – GoalBox
5 days ago · 65 comments
-
While the Iron is Hot
I absolutely agree with you as well. Not everything works for everybody.
And you know what? I don't much like plurk, either. The concept is great and I like that people can comment on your plurks, but I don't like the format. I use it now and then but right now, it won't see as much use a Twitter and FriendFeed.
Keep it real, Chris. That's what I admire most about you. ;-)
~ Annie
me and you liked it and the people at Batchbook are So Nice. But now I am leaving guilt behind and doing what does work for ME. And who knows what doesn't work now, may in the future.
I love Plurk, I really do. It's cool, it's Canadian, it's shiney. But it doesn't do much for me, and I hardly use it. All the things you said are true. I particularly see it's scalability as limiting, and the amount of attention it requires as compared to Twitter and other services make it harder to use during the day. It's not something I can log into at work and check every so often.
That said, it's more personal than Twitter by default. Not that Twitter can't be very personal, but it doesn't attempt to force personal conversations to the same extent as Plurk.
I hope that makes sense. :)
I gave Plurk a fair shake and ran into the same things you did, Chris. Trying is all you can do. Everything is not one-size-fits-all.
When we start talking about social media and all of the various social media marketing tools out there (and there are more & more every day), it's all about finding "the right tools for the job." And that's going to vary from person to person. Not everything works for everybody.
When it comes to social media types, we can easily disagree about Plurk vs. Twitter and Facebook vs. MySpace. But a few of the platforms and tools just nail it in an objective sense. RSS is beautiful. What's the alternative? What's not to like? And StumbleUpon is one of a kind.
To each their own and live and let live, for sure. But it's possible that social media truths exist beyond our whimsical opinions.
For the longest time, I swore by Yahoo Mail and Internet Explorer; before that, Hotmail and Netscape. Now, it's GMail and Firefox.
Be thankful, Chris, you're not exposed to the internet behind an iron curtain of governmental control. You're allowed to make your own decisions and display your thoughts. Everyone won't agree with you but that's their right, too.
I tried Plurk and didn't like it, either. Maybe I'll like it in the future. Or not. Time, as cliche as it is, will tell.
What you describe - individuals fawning over internet tools - I equate this to being overly enthused with airplanes. That may be OK if you are Wilbur Wright, but maybe not so much if you are Al Gore. You know, "Let's move on, folks".
On my own blog, I don't claim to have big answers to pithy questions, nor do I have lots of instructions for how to make your life better, how to quit smoking, how to find true love, blah blah. I'm not trying to get your business, I can't consult you on anything, and I have no Ginsu Knives to sell you.
No, I just like writing on my blog occasionally and sharing whatever happens to be on my mind. I don't usually follow anyone's "doing it right" formula. If someone is reading, more power to them. If not, still, more power to them.
But for heaven's sake, don't ask me to "optimize" my blog for search engines, and don't expect me to tailor my posts to generate more WOM traffic anytime soon.
I've got a few tools I like to use which make communicating easier for me and for the seven people who read my stuff. I didn't ask anyone's approval before deploying these tools. If the widgets that I've added or the content discovery tools that I use don't really make me look all "with it" and trendy, oh well.
Regarding social media, I am working IN this space, but I am not OF this space. Do I really need the latest, greatest statistical tracking program? Do I really need better avatars? Are there ten reasons why my site doesn't get the big traffic? Could I improve my market penetration by publicizing my feed on Facebook? God, did I just type that??
I'm sure after reading this, none of the cool kids will play with me. Oops. Despite my apparent 'devil may care' attitude toward social media innovation, I do always find several useful nuggets each time I visit ChrisBrogan.com and I try to credit you when I use your stuff. So far the best of all have been the people I've met through these comments (two in particular: Mari Adkins and Becky McCray).
Thanks again for the good and timely post.
I must admit I haven't even tried Plurk. I am with Twitter, and Twitter works for me, so why should I spent time on Plurk? People may say "how can you judge the value of Plurk without having tried it" - well I take that risk.
Second, some of the tools are winning because of marketing and awareness, not because they are the best. It's the VHS/Betamax thing all over again. VHS won out even thought Betamax technically was a better quality format. Why? Users adopted the VHS format more readily. The players were marketed better.
Twitter is not the most technically sound tool out there, as we all know. It is not even the most functional, from a user interface standpoint. Neither is Facebook. Don't even get me started about all the things that are wrong with MySpace. But they win because they have won over their user base. Just shows you don't always have to be the best to win.
The internet is such a big place. There's room for all of us to do what we like.
Just like in business and in life, do what works for you, leave the rest to everyone else.
Additionally, I love that there are a few of us who aren't on the plurk bandwagon. I tried it, felt that some features had real value, but overall I didn't care for total package. Karma?
I have "plurk" moments, when I like to jump in there and peek at all the conversations (and the conversations ARE easier to follow there), but as you said, they would get impossible past a certain scale. But I think that's the intent.
It wasn't really designed for the "1000+ follower" crowd, I think. It was designed for the "couple hundred actual friends and acquaintances" crowd--and I think it actually works quite well for that. (Although I still despise the karma thing.)
I think that in addition to knowing what platforms just aren't for you, period, it's good to know what ones you're just going to be a casual, occasional participant in.
With that said, you should always be open minded to new/different things, but really, only stick around if you like it and it makes sense.
I feel the same way about Plurk, but have friends in the Social Media world who feel they get better click throughs and better conversation on the service. Good for them. Didn't happen for me.
Talk to ya soon!
Yet, in social media, the power is in the adopters- the more people and friends that are there, the more fun it is, so if some of your friends don't join, you miss them and the interaction.
I honestly think there is no perfect social media tool, or social media space- it's all about the company you keep when you're there, just like going out to dinner with friends. The restaurant sets the atmosphere and occasion to get together, but you provide the fun and the conversation that makes the experience more meaningful than the food itself.
They are so worried about being left out, they forget that there are only 25 hours in a day. If you are on for business, you have to limit yourself to the sites that work. I have dumped some sites that do not produce.
I track what is going on so I do not waste time. During the summer some sites are slower.
Do what work=do what makes money!
Dr. Wright
The Wright Place TV Show
www.wrightplacetv.com
www.twitter.com/drwright1
when you say that X isn't so keen-o
some folks might not even bother trying it out
if i was part of X i'd maybe get a little defensive as well
knowing that i didn't lose just you
but all those other people who won't even bother now
?
I'd prefer Plurk without all the Karma Krap personally.
I like FriendFeed and RSS and Ping for monitoring and broadcasting. Twitter has become a place to engage and converse linearly.
As with any business tools/applications there will be those of the Early Adopters (some will die there too), innovators etc., and thus we'll always have choice. The beauty of Capitalism and a free market economy.
Change is Brilliant!
Now of course, your mileage may (and apparently does) vary.
But something i've noticed over the past few weeks is that our lil Plurk community would wonder why certain people weren't using Plurk. And you were one of those people. More than once I have heard 'Gee I wish Chris Brogan was here, he'd really love it!'
So now you've used Plurk, and you DON'T love it. So that's kinda like a slap in the face to the people that wanted you there. And of course you didn't intend it that way at all, but still.
As you are well aware, evangelists are very passionate people. I completely understand the idea of using what works for you, and agree that's what you have to do.
I also don't use Yahoo mail, AOL, Netvibes Ginger, BlogTalkRadio, and 3,414,970 services. By choice. Not because I don't like the people there.
What's the solution?
"So now you’ve used Plurk, and you DON’T love it. So that’s kinda like a slap in the face to the people that wanted you there. And of course you didn’t intend it that way at all, but still."
But still . . . what?
Not trying to be facetious / tendentious / etc. - I just don't know what comes next in that line of thought.
I actually had an argument with a friend once about getting a life. Essentially, all I particularly do with my 'life' (during the school year) is band functions and schoolwork. That's not good enough for the super jock, though. I also need to join clubs, go to parties, make new friends, etc etc.
I like the friends I have. Do I go out every night? No. On the flip side, do I have constant rumors and talking behind my back? Nope. I love music and I work hard to keep my grades up, so I don't see anything wrong with the life I've got. I have fun going to movies with my Dad, he gets my jokes.
You should always go with what's easiest for you and what makes you happy if it's something like just living your day to day life and managing things. As long as it doesn't effect them, who cares?
I was resitant to Plurk myself but it has grown on me and I have made connections through conversations I wouldn't have had on Twitter.
The social media crowd can be a fickle one... and there is an evangelistic approach to supporting specific tools. Its interesting to see how people can get defensive.
It seems like there's a popular opinion that if you don't absolutely HEART the biggest and newest social media site, you lose your Web 2.0 card. Well, you may as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb -- I'll take the opportunity to publicly admit that the iPhone has been in Canada for three whole weeks now and I don't have one of those either. :)
I have a business to run and need to focus on what works for my productivity (etc) versus what works for others.
Oh and there are plenty of other places to play (and connect with Chris). :)
However, Plurk just didn't 'do it' for me either, for much the same reasons that you quoted.