<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>chrisbrogan.com - Latest Comments in Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/corporate_blogs_can_be_good/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:13:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12286034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That can probably be said of most blogs - and most media - in general. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisDonaldson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12283570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I'd say that MOST corporate blogs are crap. And that's a technical term that means "not very personable, not very interesting, not very two way, etc."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Brogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12274600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Corporate blogs are good, As Chris Donaldson mentioned, it is hard for them to be good, but the can be great&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VBP OutSourcing</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:33:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12269115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a decent start for sure, though I think it might need more than 2 posts in 2 months to offer a fuller picture. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danny Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:45:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12255428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It may be a great piece -- if the audience is under 40.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Text too small for a 40+ audience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:48:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Corporate Blogs CAN be Good</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/corporate-blogs-can-be-good/#comment-12253651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find the headline interesting in so far as to assume most corporate blogs are 'bad'. Is this true? Are a majority of them just press releases without insight and honest discussion? If so, that landscape is changing by necessity. Thanks for the good example.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Donaldson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:00:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>