<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>chrisbrogan.com - Latest Comments in Choices</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/choices/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:47:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Choices</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/choices/#comment-8512524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have made the choice to not fight, to let what's going to happen happen. Things will work out in the end.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kitykity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Choices</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/choices/#comment-8512523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly. That's why it's not about time management, it's about action/choices; I prefer "self-management."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Choice has (at least) two implications:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Self-responsibility: Making conscious choices about our lives removes the excuse to be passive and then complain about it. Example: Not having an important but difficult conversation, then complaining about my relationship.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another example: When I'm teaching clients best practices for personal productivity, it's *empowering*, for some of them too much so. (Not too many, thankfully - plunking down $$$ tends to clarify commitment.) For example, if I get my act together, I can no longer claim it's out of my hands, or it's somebody else's fault - I explicitly take responsibility. No necessarily comfortable initially, and may be a big change for folks...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Things *not* chosen, i.e., Mark Forster's "closed lists" - deciding to do something means you've decided not to do something else. For example, spending time watching TV -&amp;gt; not spending time with my daughter and wife...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Cornell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Choices</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/choices/#comment-8512522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree.  there's always a choice to be made.  Sometimes the phrase "I had no choice" really means that there was a balance between the easy way or passive way to go, and the difficult and potentially irreversible way to go.  The Burning the Bridge choice versus some other option.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I use the phrase "I had little choice" or "have no choice"  usually means I'm backed into an uncomfortable corner and need to be a hard ass about something.  I need to draw a line or a boundary.  I've reached some limit of feasible options.  And this is saying something, because I am famous for lateral solutions to problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you really think you are out of options, you're not looking hard enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Whitney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:00:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Choices</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/choices/#comment-8512521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So very true! Thanks for the gentle reminder.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dayngr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 14:59:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>